Showing posts with label Gospel. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Gospel. Show all posts

Wednesday, July 18, 2012

BeBe & CeCe Winans - Heaven Video

Monday, July 9, 2012

Sunday’s Best Season 5 Recap Episode 1

posted by elev8.com





Sunday’s Best is back and better than ever.
New judges with ears of gold was evident in Sunday’s Best kick off episode. The words “Stop… Don’t sing another word.” was an echoed over and over for many. Kim Burrell, Donnie McClurkin and Yolanda Adams were the purveyors of talent. When the season kicks into performance competition mode CeCe Winans will be one of the judges sitting at the table. Gone are the gospel sisters extraordinaire Mary Mary.

The prize for becoming “Sundays Best 2012 winner” is a 2013 Ford Escape and a contract with Music World.

Here are just a few of the first entrants to cross over into the top 20
- Jeremy Hill
- Joshua Rogers
- Danetra Moore
- Antwon Aubry Jr.
- Kizzy Walker
- Susan Hedgepeth
- TeAndria Newsome
- Ashford Sanders

Andrea Helms and Mama Sue made an appearance as nervous artists about to auditor. As usual they both blew the top off the house! The top 20 were picked and the show was filled with laughs and tons of banter. Make sure that you are following @Elev8official om Sunday’s nights for your Sunday’s best weekly hang!

Tuesday, June 26, 2012

Gospel Artist James Fortune Issues Statement About Child Abuse Lawsuit

posted by elev8.com



Elev8 has reported popular gospel singer James Fortune is being sued for alleged child abuse.
According to an article and news video from My Fox Houston, popular Houston gospel music artist James Fortune and his wife Cheryl Fortune have been named in a five million dollar lawsuit related to the abuse of James Fortune’s stepson and Cheryl Fortune’s son. Statements in lawsuit documents, in 2001 James Fortune burned his 4-year-old step son, leaving the boy disfigured with 2nd and 3rd degree burns on nearly half of his body. His wife Cheryl was also named in the lawsuit.

The child is now 15-years old and the family has stated that the money from the lawsuit would be used to pay for plastic surgery to correct the disfigurement from the abuse. According to the civil lawsuit, James picked up his step son from pre-school and the teacher told James the boy had been acting up in class. Fortune then scolded the boy the entire ride home and continued to yell and be-raid the boy when they got home. He then prepared a scolding hot bath for the boy. The lawsuit also says James Fortune told the boy to take off his clothes and preceded to whip the boy before pushing the toddler in the scolding hot bath, holding him underwater causing 2nd and 3rd degree burns.


In 2003 James Fortune plead guilty to felony injury to a child and received 6 years deferred adjudication.

The toddlers biological father is responsible for the lawsuit and is suing for $5 Million in order to take care of the boy’s continued plastic surgery.
A statement issued from James Fortune below:
I recently became aware of a civil suit pending against my wife, Cheryl Fortune and I, for an incident that occurred in 2001 involving my stepson. There was a criminal investigation and all matters were resolved in 2003. Since that time, my family and I, including my stepson, have continued with family traditions and always have a loving family environment. We are shocked by this lawsuit but understand people are free to use the court system to pursue claims, whether they contain merit or baseless matters. We are confident through this process, if it proceeds to a judge or jury, the ultimate decision maker will render a decision that is favorable to the circumstances and timing surrounding this situation. We believe in our American justice system and know it will work for us as it has for millions of other Americans.
I love all my children, including my stepson, and I ask for your prayers as we deal with this matter privately. Thank you for your continued support for me, my family, and ministry

Wednesday, June 20, 2012

Watch Cedric the Entertainer in The Soul Man on TV Land in June 2012




TV review: Charming 'The Soul Man' knows to not try too hard

'The Soul Man' on TV Land is a comedy that keeps it light. Cedric the Entertainer stars as a former R&B star who becomes a preacher.



Like "Hot in Cleveland,"the show from whence it sprung, TV Land's new comedy "The Soul Man" is positioning itself to be retro-cool — a backlash against the high-concept, sardonic and/or emotionally strung-out comedies that have become so ubiquitous that "Nurse Jackie" is considered, technically, funny.
Instead of three middle-aged women finding peace and occasionally wisdom once they abandon L.A. for Cleveland, "The Soul Man" sends former R&B star Boyce "The Voice"Ballentine (Cedric the Entertainer) back to his roots in St. Louis where he trades music videos for a pulpit and takes over as the reverend of his father's church.
Also making the transition from celebrity to a life of service are his wife, Lolli (Niecy Nash), and teen daughter, Lyric (Jazz Raycole).
Without the benefit of their own personal epiphanies, Lolli and Lyric are having a tougher time adjusting to life as the preacher's family, though it's not all that easy for Boyce either. Though retired, Boyce's father Barton (John Beasley) still wants to run things, and not everyone's buying the newly sanctified Boyce, especially younger brother Stamps (Wesley Jonathan), who is, rather predictably, a smart-mouthed slacker.
Indeed there are many things that are predictable about "The Soul Man." Created by Cedric and "Hot in Cleveland's" Suzanne Martin, it serves up Lolli's feistiness, Lyric's sassiness, nosy church ladies with big hats and hair issues, and early story arcs that too patly run conflict, crisis, reconciliation, wisdom gained. (It is also filmed in front of an audience, which means a lot of irritating laughter.)
But it is a funny and charming show nonetheless — and not just because Boyce is a big and obvious fan of my alma mater, the University of Missouri Columbia (go Tigers!). Cedric is a charismatic yet soothing presence, quite believable in this role.
Boyce and Lolli appear to have a marriage that is recognizable as an actual marriage rather than an expository excuse for jokes about sex, nagging and how-can-you-not-know-where-the-oil-gauge-is. As the resident geriatric know-it-all, Beasley has the toughest job, but he's a pro and gives Barton just enough pride and humility to keep things fluid.
It's also nice to see a show that revolves around a house of worship, albeit nondenominational and following a catechism that appears to be based more on uplifting music than actual scripture. In the first two episodes, Boyce must help parishioners handle death and alcoholism and in each case, the writing wobbles a bit between humor and disrespect.
Though it never quite hits its stride, the show never pitches us into the abyss. "The Soul Man" is about a star trying to become a vessel, which is in direct opposition to most comedies. If anything close to that actually plays out here, it might just start a revolution.

Tuesday, January 17, 2012

2012 Stellar Award Winners!

posted by elev8.com
The 2012 Stellar Awards blessed many and inspired others!
Marvin Sapp and Dorinda Clark Cole hosted the show, which celebrates gospel music and  a “spirit-filled, hand-clapping, foot-stomping revival.” True to the description, the program was full of soaring performances from Kirk Franklin, Earnest Pugh, Fred Hammond, Ricky Dillard & New G, Richard Smallwood & Vision and other groups as well as choir performances that frequently had people up dancing or moved them to tears.
Gospel singer/composer VaShawn Mitchell swept six categories, more than any other artist, to become Saturday night’s big winner at the 27th annual Stellar Awards, which were held at the Grand Ole Opry House and will air on television in syndication Saturday through Feb. 26 on the GMC cable network.
Take a look at the list of winners at the Stellar Awards.
  • Artist of the Year: Vashawn Mitchell- Triumphant
  • Song of the Year: Kirk Frankllin,  Smile – Hello Fear
  • Male Vocalist of Year: Vashawn Mitchell – Triumphant
  • Albertina Walker Female Vocalist of the Year: Kim Burrell – The Love Album
  • Group/Duo of the Year: Mary Mary – Something Big
  • New Artist of the Year: Y’Anna Crawley, The Promise
  • CD of the year: Kirk Franklin – Hello Fear
  • Choir of the Year: Ricky Dillard & New G - Keep Living
  • Producers of the Year: Kirk Franklin – Hello Fear
  • Comtemporary Group/Duo of the Year: Mary Mary – Something Big
  • Traditional Group/Duo of the Year: The Rance Allen Group – The Live Experience
  • Contemportary Male of the Year: Vashawn Mitchell – Triumphant
  • Traditional Male Vocalist of the Year: Smokie Norful – How I got Over Songs that Carried Us
  • Contemporary Female Vocalists of the Year: Kim Burrell – The Love Album
  • Traditional Female Vocalist of the Year: Beverly Crawford – Live from Los Angeles
  • Contemporary CD of the Year: Kirk Frankly – Hello Fear
  • Traditional CD of the Year: Smokie Norful – How I got Over Songs that Carried Us
  • Urban/Inspirational single or performance of the Year: Vashawn Mitchell – Noboby Greater
  • Music Video of the Year, Short Format: Vashawn Mitchell - Noboby Greater
  • Music Video of the Year, Long Format: Deitrick Haddon – Church on the Moon: Part one
  • Traditional Choir of the Year: Mississippi Mass Choir
  • Contemporary Choir of the Year: Shekinah Glory Ministy
  • Thomas A Dorsey Most Notable Achievement Award Honoree: Vy Higginsen
  • Ambassador Dr. Bobby Jones Legend Awards Honoree: Dorothy Norwood
  • James Cleveland Lifetime Achievement Award Honoree: John P. Kee
The Stellar Awards annually honor three of gospel music’s most celebrated veterans with specialty awards. This year a tearful John P. Kee was presented with the James Cleveland Lifetime Achievement Award. Vy Higginsen accepted the Thomas Dorsey Most Notable Achievement Award. Dorothy Norwood, often called the world’s greatest gospel storyteller, was given the Dr. Bobby Jones Legends Award.

Wednesday, December 7, 2011

Can God Really Heal The Heart Of A Man On The Down Low?

Can God Really Heal The Heart Of A Man On The Down Low?

Can God Really Heal The Heart Of A Man On The Down Low?
Written by Ingrid Michelle on December 5, 2011 9:00 am

Assuming you are unaware, let me break down the definition of a down low brother for a second from MY perspective and then we can deal with the question of “Can God REALLY Heal The Heart Of A Man On The Down Low?”  Before I go there though, I want to share this.  I went to a funeral today and ran into a guy who is a minister of the gospel.  We reacquainted and exchanged phone numbers.  He told me that he started reading my book, “Life AFTER the Down Low,” and that he had been praying for me.  He said, “I know what you’re going through…I assume you know my story.”  I didn’t.  The short of the long is, he was living a gay lifestyle for 23 years and has been delivered.  He knew he wanted to be married BUT also knew it was imperative that he get counseled (by a professional) before he entered into that type of monogamous relationship with a woman.  He said, “It wasn’t enough for me to just tear down the structure, I had to dig up the foundation so there was no residue.”  I nodded and commended him on his journey.  I walked away from him thinking…now THAT is what I’m talking about.  A man who understands the value of another person (a woman) enough to completely detonate the bomb of his previous life choices so that they could in no way cause an explosion in his intended relationship with his now wife.  With that said…my perspective…
My wikipedia definition of a down low man:
A man who is on the down low is playing games – plain and simple.   They are playing Russian Roulette with the lives of those whom they are physically acquainted.  They are intentionally deceiving their female counterparts into relations with them (most times sexual in nature) while maintaining intimate connections with men (whether oral or anal).  Their subscription isn’t “gay,” they are bi-sexual unbeknown to the the general public.  They are insecure control freaks knowing that if they were discovered, the relationship that they are trying to hold on to will be no longer.  So they withhold valuable information for as long as it can be held in an effort to maintain dominion in their union.  They are thieves and liars.  They steal choices.  They know exactly what they’re doing.  They plan it.  It is well thought out and hidden.  It is neatly constructed.  They risk their health and that of their female partners, wives, girlfriends, etc.  They establish relationships smothered with manipulation and narcissism.  Everything becomes about them – what THEY want and how THEY want it.  When THEY are ready to come clean THEY will but until then the games must go on.  They become part of communities of men that are engaging in the same behavior and the arrogance becomes insurmountable.  They make you feel inferior as the recipient because after all, they love you.
So…I ask, can God heal that?  Can God take that deceptive heart…that evil that is being perpetrated against a woman – sometimes intentionally issuing death sentences with the AIDS or HIV virus…can God take those ill intentions and turn it around for His glory?  Sure He can…if the spirit is willing.  The crazy thing is, we enter into this relationship with Christ willfully.  We come because we want to come.  YES!  The invitation has been extended to our hearts – it’s been extended to everyone already and we DECIDE to accept it or not.  And guess what, there are some who don’t.  And there will be plenty who will never.  So…the same relates to the healing and deliverance from this heinous behavior called the down low.  If you really want NOT to be a double-crosser, it ain’t nothing but a decision.  Will it be easy?  NO!  Heck no!  Especially when you have been trained to deceive.  When your heart has been inaugurated into the deep of darkness, you have to want out like a desperate prisoner.  And the only way to get out and have the spirits that once resided and controlled you gone, is to have a right relationship with Christ.  Since everything is predicated upon the premise of God’s perfect will, then this doesn’t change.  You have to want to be delivered and you have to want to be WHO God intended that you be – period.  In order for your heart to heal from the falsehood of the down low, you have to willfully surrender to God.  You have to call your stuff what it is – BY NAME and not skirt around calling it, “issues.”  And if you don’t, there can be no healing.  Point blank – end of story…

Wednesday, November 23, 2011

Should Chistians have Plastic Surgery?


As I watched the final tear-jerking moments of Extreme Makeover, I couldn’t help but feel envious. While the latest recipient of a plethora of cosmetic enhancement procedures walked into a room full of amazed family and friends, revealing her new “identity,” I sat on my sofa feeling fat, lumpy, and old.
Granted this woman had already won my heart with her life story of rejection, abuse, and poverty. She was a deserving candidate for an all-expenses-paid radical makeover if ever there was one. But as I watched her successfully undergo breast augmentation surgery, I was reminded of my own struggle to even “fill out” my bathing suit each year. As she revealed her sparkling new smile, I became more conscious of my medicine-stained teeth. And as this mother of six lost her belly with a simple incision, I bemoaned the crunches I would need to do before bedtime to stay in a matronly size ten.
I turned off the television and headed for the track to work off my fat the old-fashioned way. With pride oozing from my pores, I ran, contemplating the recent fascination with extreme makeovers. Quickly I decided that such radical measures to improve one’s appearance were pure vanity, and, therefore, strictly off limits for godly women such as myself. But things tend to change as I run. All too often God has gently changed my prideful heart as I have pounded the pavement. While I gloated over my conclusion that cosmetic surgeries, cosmetic dental procedures and treatments such as collagen injections were basically a combination of vanity and poor stewardship, I was reminded of a few points I had overlooked.
What about the $80 I had spent last month to have my hair highlighted? And the $25 I had spent on a pedicure? Or the $20 I had spent on over-the-counter teeth whiteners? I had spent large sums of money for purely cosmetic reasons without ever questioning the spiritual implications. Why was I now questioning the integrity and maturity of people who had simply done the same, albeit on a larger scale? As I finished my final lap I realized that I had been too quick to form an opinion about something I had not put adequate thought into, prayed over, or checked out in God’s Word.
The cultural trend
As with most reality-based television programs, Extreme Makeover does not actually reflect the reality of today’s culture. This ABC primetime show has enjoyed success because it offers an altered reality. However, according to the American Society of Aesthetic Plastic Surgery (ASAPS), the reality of the cosmetic makeover trend is that extreme is “out” and subtle is “in.” ASAPS’ November, 2003, survey of 1,000 American households revealed that 39 percent of women are dissatisfied with at least one facial or body feature and 25 percent of the women surveyed would consider cosmetic plastic surgery. Still, among those who would contemplate surgery, only 27 percent would favor an extreme change.[i]
While only one quarter of American women may choose to alter their appearance through surgery, an ever-rising number of women are deciding to have other types of cosmetic procedures done. According to ASAPS, approximately 5.28 million non-surgical procedures were performed in 2002. These purely cosmetic treatments include Botox and collagen injections, microdermabrasion, laser hair removal, and chemical peels.[ii] Women of all walks of life are suddenly in a position to contemplate more appearance-changing procedures than ever before. Today these procedures are widely available, tested and proven safe, financially attainable, and socially acceptable.
The dilemma
While most contemporary Christian women have no qualms about wearing cosmetics or acrylic nails, fewer of us have seriously contemplated such invasive procedures as augmentation mammaplasty (breast enlargement), abdominoplasty (tummy tuck) or rhytidectomy (facelift). Until recently, only movie stars and millionaires considered these surgeries.
But with the cultural trend of going to more extremes for appearances’ sake, it is normal to ask the simple question, “Is this okay?”
To accurately evaluate the issue of cosmetic enhancement, I must put all the cards on the table, side by side. When I honestly look at the issue, I come to the conclusion that while some procedures may be more costly, invasive, risky or drastic, ultimately they are all similar in nature: artificial and unnecessary. (I am only addressing surgeries and procedures done for primarily cosmetic reasons, not those done for medical reasons.)
I also have to admit that all cosmetic enhancements share these defining qualities, including acrylic nails, tanning lotions and teeth whiteners. The tint I put on my hair, the makeup I won’t do without, and the pedicure I get at the beginning of each summer are all artificial and unnecessary.
Then why do they seem more extreme?
In honesty I must admit that my inclination to deem some cosmetic procedures acceptable and others extreme really has an ugly root: envy. If I can’t afford the procedure or I am nervous about the surgery or my husband doesn’t want me to have the treatment, then I may arrogantly label what I can’t have as extreme.
Still, once I have put all of these cosmetic procedures on a level playing field, I need to make some decisions about their validity. Certainly opportunities for physical enhancement will only become more readily available and feasible. It is not unlikely that one of my friends, family members, or fellow church members could have what I might consider an “extreme makeover” in the near future. The conclusions I reach now about these enhancements will determine how I treat these people after they have had their teeth professionally whitened, their breasts enlarged, or their wrinkles erased. Will I talk behind their backs out of jealousy or will I be glad for them? Will I silently condemn them or rejoice with them? At the same time, perhaps I need to re-evaluate even the low-cost, non-invasive, cosmetic procedures I undergo on a regular basis.
The Biblical perspective
The subject of cosmetic enhancements is only vaguely mentioned in the Bible. Fortunately that absence of direct instruction does not leave us helpless. As with every other area of life, God has provided the necessary principles that will guide me through my personal decisions about cosmetically enhancing procedures—extreme or otherwise.
  1. Principle #1 – My body does not belong to me, but to God.
    Any time we consider the body and how to treat it, we must begin with the fact that, as Christians, our bodies belong to God and are to be used only to bring him honor. Because my body no longer belongs to me, I need to treat it as if it were a precious item on loan from a friend. That means I will consult the Owner before I do anything to change it.
  2. Principle #2 – With my focus on pleasing God, I can make confident choices concerning my appearance.
    With my self-esteem anchored in who I am in Christ, I can proceed forward in making wise choices about my appearance as well as other personal decisions. I can know that my efforts to beautify my face and body are not attempts to gain worth and value, but simply to be the best I can be.
  3. Principle #3 – God graciously allows me to make personal choices, but I am expected to make wise and godly decisions that distinguish me from the world.
    The Bible teaches that as a recipient of God’s grace I can make personal decisions with a clean conscience. I need not fret over displeasing God if I happen to “mess up.” But in Titus 2:11-12, I am reminded that God’s grace is the very thing that teaches me to “say ‘No’ to ungodliness and worldly passions, and to live [a] self-controlled, upright and godly [life] in this present age.” This principle leads me to see that while I have freedom in Christ, that freedom is never to be used in a way that will tarnish my Christian testimony. That is not to say I will have to decide against certain cosmetic procedures, but it does mean I must consider how some procedures may affect my relationships and my effectiveness as a witness.
  4. Principle #4 – My focus should be on my inner woman.
    The Bible makes it clear that God is more interested in a beautiful heart than a beautiful head of curls. In 1 Samuel, David is anointed king rather than his tall, handsome brother because David has a heart for God. And in 1 Peter, women are reminded to put more effort into developing a gentle and quiet spirit than an outward beauty. Still, both of these passages go on to indicate there is nothing wrong with a lovely appearance or external grooming. David is said to have had “a fine appearance and handsome features” (1 Samuel 16:12) and Peter indicates that some outward adornment is the norm. The principle here is while outward adornment and beautification are fine, they should never become what drive me. If I spend more money, time, and effort developing my outward beauty than my inner woman, I need to rethink my priorities.
The bottom line
Now that I have identified envy as the root of my criticism of some of the cosmetic enhancement procedures I have often deemed as extreme, and now that I have searched the Bible for God’s authoritative word on the issue of outward beautification, I must admit that my opinion on the matter has changed somewhat. While I still am not planning to go under the knife myself, I no longer feel decisively superior to those who do. And my husband and I have talked a little more seriously about saving money so that I can have my teeth professionally whitened.
I know that my greatest source of beauty is a thriving and fruitful relationship with Christ. I know that a daily diet of his Word and the consistent exercise of prayer are what will ultimately enhance even my physical countenance the most. Still, I want to look and feel my best so that I can represent my Lord well. Therefore I am at peace with my personal decisions to tint my hair, wear cosmetics, and even indulge in the occasional pedicure. I also am at peace with the choices others make. I have learned that I cannot judge motives, nor can I arbitrarily decide what is extreme and what is acceptable.

Wednesday, November 2, 2011

God Wants Us to be Rich. Does Prosperity Preaching Work?


Dr. Boyce Watkins Asks: Does the Prosperity Gospel Actually Work?




Nearly every African American knows just how important the black church is to our community. We also know about "prosperity gospel," the act of preaching about God within the context of wealth building.

I admit that this form of faith is a bit odd to me. I am a Finance Professor and I become confused when my pastor talks about money more than I do. The saddest truth is that it's hard to tell the difference between a pastor and a pimp: Most pastors aren't pimps, but any pimp could be a pastor. The same skill set is required in both professions.

My father is a preacher, but he almost never preaches about money. I've never heard him asking for money on the pulpit, or mentioning that giving money to him is one of the keys to gaining access to heaven. But I don't presume that my father is right about all things, and given that I write about money on a regular basis, I have gained an appreciation for what financial resources can do to enhance your life. Also, one must be aware of the pragmatic realities of running a church: You have the building fund, bills to pay every month and any community service initiatives that the church chooses to pursue. The proper use of money can certainly enhance your ability to do God's work.

I am not one to say that a pastor shouldn't make a healthy income, even an income that is in the millions. But many Americans are having a hard time correlating the need for massive wealth with the desire to serve God. Money is a drug, and most of us know that drug addicts are not the most loyal among us. If a pastor spends too much time talking about money, then that obviously leads one to question whether they are speaking for a higher power or reaching for a higher paycheck. Also, given that part of the mandate of God is to help the poor, one wonders if a financially-obsessed pastor has any incentive to focus on helping those who have the fewest resources: one example is how several prominent New York pastors went against the wishes of their congregations and endorsed Mayor Michael Bloomberg after receiving large donations to their churches. At the very least, my upper lip crinkles when I see a pastor in a mansion with half the congregation struggling to pay the rent; that just doesn't make much sense to me.

Here are some thoughts and questions I have about money and the black church, some of which I will never fully understand:

1) Why would someone ask me to bring my W2 forms to church? More and more churches are starting to do this, but they won't be getting mine. No one's getting my W2 forms except the IRS. Even though most black churches are not asking for W2 forms, the request for such crucial financial information leaves the church dancing on the thin line between a legitimate religious organization and a good old fashioned cult.

2) Do I have to give money to the church or can I simply give it to charity? Can't you give to God by doing God's work and helping the poor, or must all that money go directly to the pastor first? What would Jesus do? I'll take the "Jesus did it" package please.

3) Does a pastor's credibility decline if he is making millions from his ministry? I am not one to say that wealth does or doesn't have an impact on a pastor's credibility, but I'd love to get other perspectives on the issue. I became a bit nervous when I heard TD Jakes refer to Jesus as a "product." Are you serious? Well, I guess I can buy Jesus in Walmart, so that would pretty much confirm what the pastor is saying. But when I buy Jesus in Walmart, am I getting the real spirit of Jesus or an idolatrous representation of American capitalism? TD Jakes is good at what he does, so I am sure he has a good answer for that.

4) Should there be transparency in where the money goes? Creflo Dollar, who was under investigation by the Senate Finance Committee, has refused to release any financial information to the public. Why not? Shouldn't his parishioners have access to that information? One of the fundamentals of good government is the idea of transparency. If there is nothing to hide, then we usually don't go out of our way to hide it.

Click here to read more.

SOURCE: Your Black Money
Dr. Boyce Watkins, Syracuse University - Scholarship in Action